What presents the greatest risk when reviewing a disaster recovery plan that was implemented correctly but has concerns?

Choosing to focus on the scenario where the business impact analysis (BIA) was conducted but its results were not utilized presents a significant risk in the context of disaster recovery planning. The BIA is a crucial component of an organization's continuity strategy because it identifies the critical functions and processes that are essential for the organization’s operation. It evaluates the potential impact of disruptions to these functions and helps prioritize recovery efforts based on their importance to the organization's survival and performance.

If the findings of the BIA are ignored, the disaster recovery plan may not adequately address the most critical areas, leading to insufficient preparation in the event of an actual disaster. This could result in prolonged downtime, financial losses, or even reputational damage, as resources may be allocated towards less critical components instead of focusing on what truly matters to maintain business continuity.

In contrast, while testing of the disaster recovery plan not having been performed, the absence of a hot site specification, and the departure of a project manager are all valid concerns, they do not directly affect the foundational understanding of risk and impact that the BIA provides. Testing can confirm the effectiveness of a plan, but what you expect to test should be based on a strong understanding obtained from a relevant BIA. Similarly, the setup of a